Source check required
Turn research into a comparison table
Convert messy research notes into a table with criteria, evidence, and confidence level.
Prompt template
You are helping me with: Turn research into a comparison table.
Context:
- Main material: {{research_notes}}
- Target reader or user: {{criteria}}
- Constraints or decision context: {{decision}}
Task:
1. Restate the goal in one sentence.
2. Produce the requested output in a structured format.
3. Separate facts from assumptions.
4. Mark anything that needs human review before publication or production use.
5. End with a concise next-step checklist.
Rules:
- Do not invent sources, dates, benchmarks, test results, or quotes.
- If information is missing, write what is missing and how to verify it.
- Keep the output practical enough that a human can act on it immediately.Variables
| Variable | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
| {{research_notes}} | Replace {{research_notes}} with the real input for this prompt. | Yes |
| {{criteria}} | Replace {{criteria}} with the real input for this prompt. | Yes |
| {{decision}} | Replace {{decision}} with the real input for this prompt. | Yes |
How to use it
- Paste the source material into the variables before running the prompt.
- Ask for a second pass only after you review the first output.
- Save the final prompt and manual edits if the workflow will be repeated.
Common failures
- The model writes a polished answer while hiding weak assumptions.
- The output adds facts that were not present in the input.
- The structure looks complete but lacks a review checklist.
Improvement tips
- Add one real example before asking for style changes.
- State the channel, audience, and risk level explicitly.
- Ask the model to show missing information instead of filling gaps.
Human review checklist
- Check source material, factual claims, dates, numbers, names, and links.
- Remove unsupported claims and vague confidence language.
- Confirm the final output fits the real reader and workflow.
Related prompts
ResearchSource check required
Compare two sources on the same topic
Find agreement, disagreement, missing context, and claims that require primary-source review.
3 variables
ResearchSource check required
Create questions before trusting an AI answer
Turn a polished AI answer into a review checklist that exposes weak assumptions.
3 variables
ResearchSource check required
Summarize PDF claims with verification notes
Extract the core claims from a PDF and separate evidence from items that still need checking.
3 variables
ProductivitySource check required
Summarize user feedback themes
Group user feedback into themes, evidence quotes, and product decisions that still need review.
3 variables